<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boom Boom Beckett</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joshqpublic.com/2007/10/04/boom-boom-beckett/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joshqpublic.com/2007/10/04/boom-boom-beckett/</link>
	<description>For the public, by The Public</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 02:10:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Singles &#187; Boom Boom Beckett</title>
		<link>http://joshqpublic.com/2007/10/04/boom-boom-beckett/comment-page-1/#comment-12358</link>
		<dc:creator>Singles &#187; Boom Boom Beckett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 20:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshqpublic.com/blog2/2007/10/04/boom-boom-beckett/#comment-12358</guid>
		<description>[...] admin wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptThe Angels could only muster a paltry four singles in nine innings off Boston ace Josh Beckett. Howâ€™s that Hanley Ramirez for Boom Boom and Lowell trade looking now? Yes, Hanley will be a very good shortstop for a very long time. &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] admin wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptThe Angels could only muster a paltry four singles in nine innings off Boston ace Josh Beckett. Howâ€™s that Hanley Ramirez for Boom Boom and Lowell trade looking now? Yes, Hanley will be a very good shortstop for a very long time. &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

